#1326 closed enhancement (fixed)
Some SnpEff effects should be ignored
Reported by: | Nicklas Nordborg | Owned by: | Nicklas Nordborg |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Variant Search v1.2 |
Component: | net.sf.basedb.varsearch | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
The ANN field that is created by SnpEff can be a large table with multiple rows and columns. The order of the rows is affected by the "Impact" (HIGH/MODERATE/LOW/MODIFIER) of the effect. This order is not always the most practical order when trying to extract information since a HIGH impact effect may contain less information than a MODERATE impact effect. For example, the E545A mutation in PIK3CA (chr3:179218304 A>C) is annotated with 7 rows protein_protein_contact
having HIGH impact but there is no protein change information. On row 8 there is a MODERATE effect that also contains the p.Glu545Ala
(=E545A) protein change.
There are similar variants with structural_interaction_variant
effect.
So when indexing and displaying information I think we should ignore effects with less information in favor for those with more information.
In 6383: