Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #449, comment 8


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 10, 2013, 4:24:02 PM (11 years ago)
Author:
olle

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #449, comment 8

    initial v1  
    11Design discussion regarding case numbers:
    22
    3 Previously a blood sample have been registered as a new 'Sample' with 'Blood' as it's subtype, with name equal to the case number + '.b' as suffix (see Ticket #350, "Blood referral form registration wizard" for details). In order to use this scheme for follow-up blood samples, a case must be found for the sample. A problem is that sometimes a patient has been operated for cancer in both breasts some time apart, leading to one patient having two case numbers (if the cancer was bi-lateral, and both breasts were operated at the same time, two case numbers are still used, one for each specimen, but a blood sample is only named for one of them).
     3Previously a blood sample has been registered as a new 'Sample' with 'Blood' as it's subtype, with name equal to the case number + '.b' as suffix (see Ticket #350, "Blood referral form registration wizard" for details). In order to use this scheme for follow-up blood samples, a case must be found for the sample. A problem is that sometimes a patient has been operated for cancer in both breasts some time apart, leading to one patient having two case numbers (if the cancer was bi-lateral, and both breasts were operated at the same time, two case numbers are still used, one for each specimen, but a blood sample is only named for one of them).
    44
    55For follow-up blood samples, the registration wizard should work as follows regarding finding a case number for the sample: